<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Savings and the REMOTE wall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainable.cchrc-research.org/2008/06/energy-savings-and-the-remote-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainable.cchrc-research.org/2008/06/energy-savings-and-the-remote-wall/</link>
	<description>Are you Sustain Able?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: garrison</title>
		<link>http://sustainable.cchrc-research.org/2008/06/energy-savings-and-the-remote-wall/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainable.cchrc-research.org/?p=87#comment-73</guid>
		<description>good analysis, graph was the right way to show the economic response curve! The four inch eps wall should have come out around R31 though--your results will be even better for the money I&#039;ll bet. I think you knew that already though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good analysis, graph was the right way to show the economic response curve! The four inch eps wall should have come out around R31 though&#8211;your results will be even better for the money I&#8217;ll bet. I think you knew that already though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

